I'm fine with that too, as long as the documentation gets updated
accordingly.
Dennis, can you attach a new patch for MPCHANGELOG-81? I'd like to
release it this week.
Cheers,
-Lukas
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
Yes, an url must have this syntax that was supported until few days
before your patch (SCM-106).
I prefer too that scm url start with scm:, so we'll respect URI standard
format.You can provide a new patch for code and docs and i'll apply it.
Your previous patch wasn't in previoys release, so if you send a new
patch, there won't be any difference for users.
Emmanuel
Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
I've had some more time to think about this. We called it an SCM URL,
so that would mean that it is a URL of some sort. Having had a look at
RFC2396 [2] section 3 "URI Syntactic Components", the syntax for a URI
is:
<scheme>:<scheme-specific-part>
URIs start with the scheme, which in our case is "scm", followed by a
colon. What comes after the scheme is up to the maintainer of the
scheme to decide upon.
So according to that we should not allow SCM URLs that start with
"scm|" because that would make it a non-URI.
We still need to define the scheme-specific-part, though.
[2] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
