slightly OT: the JDK1.5 question also applies to the native Java implementation of maven-scm-providers-git.
This is now even more interesting as Shawn changed the license of egit from LGPL to BSD a while ago. This means we have no license problems anymore. Grant, I've not yet looked at the accurev code, but how does it invoke the SCM? Via API or via command line? LieGrue, strub --- ggardner <gdgard...@optusnet.com.au> schrieb am Di, 13.1.2009: > Von: ggardner <gdgard...@optusnet.com.au> > Betreff: Re: accurev provider > An: scm-dev@maven.apache.org > Datum: Dienstag, 13. Januar 2009, 11:14 > Thanks, I wanted an excuse to try out a coverage tool. 6 > more lines in the > pom and Cobertura tells me 90% coverage. > > Though one immediate question is whether it is acceptable > for one provider > to require JDK 1.5. If not I'll have to remove JDK 1.5 > dependancies > (generics, JMock, JUnit4) that were useful for putting it > all together in a > TDD fashion. > > Grant. > > On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:21:15 -0800, Jason van Zyl > <jvan...@sonatype.com> > wrote: > > If you got code then you need to accompany it with > complete tests or > > we're likely not to look at it. > > > > On 12-Jan-09, at 4:51 AM, ggardner wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I've been working on extending the AccuRev > provider implementation > >> to be > >> fully compatible with the maven release plugin. > >> (ie update, status, checkin, tag, checkout, add) > >> > >> I think I'm pretty close with the necessary > commands implemented and > >> the > >> tck tests passing against an AccuRev evaluation > install. > >> > >> Assuming someone here is interested I'll have > a bunch of questions > >> about > >> how I might go about contributing this code. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Grant. > >> > >> > >> > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jason > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Jason van Zyl > > Founder, Apache Maven > > jason at sonatype dot com > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > What matters is not ideas, but the people who have > them. Good people > > can fix bad ideas, but good ideas can't save bad > people. > > > > -- Paul Graham
