Brett,
There is no way we accept the Sleepcat license, it's viral. It is also
heavily recommend against using because it can force you to have to
redistribute your source code. That from our IP lawyer who deals with
every day. Please don't dispense legal advice. Everything in law is in
in
So I have moved back the provider to sandbox and start a fork here [1]
If someone want to have karma ping me.
--
Olivier
[1] http://code.google.com/p/maven-scm-provider-svnjava/
2009/3/20 Jason van Zyl :
> Brett,
>
> There is no way we accept the Sleepcat license, it's viral. It is also
> heavily
On 21/03/2009, at 6:38 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Brett,
There is no way we accept the Sleepcat license, it's viral. It is
also heavily recommend against using because it can force you to
have to redistribute your source code. That from our IP lawyer who
deals with every day. Please don't
On 21/03/2009, at 9:05 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
So I have moved back the provider to sandbox and start a fork here [1]
If someone want to have karma ping me.
I suggest we just remove the provider from the sandbox then rather
than have the ambiguity.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
br...@apache.org
