Hi :) I think editing posts can lead to confusions about the main thrust of what was being discussed. In at least 1 case i have seen it used to reverse the meaning of the original post.
Regards from Tom :) ________________________________ From: MR ZenWiz <mrzen...@gmail.com> To: users@libreoffice.org Sent: Wed, 9 February, 2011 21:40:49 Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Ubuntu - "don't install LibreOffice manually from the ".deb" files" On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:33 PM, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions <webmas...@krackedpress.com> wrote: >> Please don't edit out the less relevant parts in replies you post. :-) > What about the text that, if I read it correctly, LibreOffice and > OpenOffice.org cannot be installed and run on the same machine? I know that > with Ubuntu 10.10 that OOo 3.3 and LibreOffice 3.3 runs well on my desktop. > The only problem is the default runtime application for the file formats. This relates to the desktop-integration package and is easily enough controlled by modifying the Nautilus Properties of one file of each type you want to open in LO vs. OOo. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/users/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
