But the issue is now what it's called. The problem is that it doesn't
screen down consistently, giving a full new screen save for a consistent
one- or two-line overlap at the top.

On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 15:25 +0000, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> Yes, the button probably should say "Screen down" instead of page down for 
> most uses of the button and only say "Page down" for those rare cases where 
> it really does mean a page.  
> Regards from  
> Tom :)  
> 
> PS blimey a short answer for once!!  lol
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >________________________________
> > From: Brian Barker <b.m.bar...@btinternet.com>
> >To: users@global.libreoffice.org 
> >Sent: Friday, 15 February 2013, 15:15
> >Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] page down in word processors
> > 
> >At 09:35 15/02/2013 -0500, Eric Beversluis wrote:
> >> Something I've never figured out--and seems true of LO/OO as well as M$ 
> >> Word: When reading through a document, one hits 'PgDn', but one doesn't 
> >> get a new page--it only scrolls down some seemingly arbitrary number of 
> >> lines. One has to scan the new screen to see what one left off reading and 
> >> one may only have gotten a half page of new reading for the effort.
> >> 
> >> Maybe I'm spoiled by e-readers. But maybe, even after all these years, I 
> >> haven't figured out how to do this correctly in a word processor.
> >
> >I think you are missing the different functions of the two sorts of 
> >software.  E-readers are what they say they are: readers.  In other words, 
> >their users are using them to read documents.  More than that, in general 
> >they will be reading the documents sequentially: when they get to the end of 
> >one page, they will next want to see the next page.  And the only sense of 
> >"page" is as much as fills the screen of the display device.
> >
> >Word processors are quite different.  In general, they are still fixated on 
> >printing the final document: the page size is the format of the eventual 
> >supposed printed version, not necessarily (and not usually) the size and 
> >format of the screen used for display.  People usually choose settings that 
> >display less than a printed page of a document; if you were looking at such 
> >a screenful and then moved down a full page, you would unhelpfully have 
> >missed part of the text.
> >
> >But the bigger point is that a word processor is designed for editing, not 
> >reading.  If you are editing at one point in a document and you now need to 
> >move down to a point currently off your screen image, it is not at all 
> >obvious - quite unlikely, in fact - that you would want to move to a 
> >following page.  It is much more likely that you would want to be able to 
> >see some part of the document further down but whilst also still seeing the 
> >part on which you had just been working.
> >
> >The original model, then, is that no-one would read documents on screen but 
> >only from hard copy.  It is interesting that software has been moving 
> >towards servicing screen reading, albeit rather slowly.  Microsoft 
> >Powerpoint allows you to save a presentation as a "slide show", in which 
> >case it opens for any recipient as for display, not for further editing.  
> >Microsoft Word has a reading mode, which displays screenfuls - not 
> >necessarily in the original layout - and in which your page down function 
> >works as you want.  There is also a freeware Word Viewer available from 
> >Microsoft, intended for users without Microsoft Word installed.  Again, 
> >since this is a reader and not an editor, it responds to page down requests 
> >by moving down a screenful.  Oh, and try opening a read-only file with 
> >LibreOffice Writer: I think you'll find that it will now treat "page down" 
> >differently and move down (almost) a screenful.
> >
> >Should word processing and similar software provide an explicit reading mode 
> >for use in reading, not editing, documents?  Possibly.  Meanwhile, if you 
> >want something close to this behaviour in Writer, here's your workaround: 
> >just click the Edit File button in the Standard toolbar to toggle on this 
> >behaviour.
> >
> >I trust this helps.
> >
> >Brian Barker
> >
> >
> >-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
> >Problems? 
> >http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> >Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> >List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
> >All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
> >deleted
> >
> >
> >
> >



-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to